Shared paths are the most common type of facility due to the cost of constructing separated paths, limitations in the physical area available for a path and the versatility of a shared path, being accessible by all users. Shared paths should be used in situations where there is demand for both a cycling/e-scooter and a pedestrian facility, but where the demand is not expected to be sufficiently great to provide separated facilities. However, as cycling and the popularity of Personal Mobility Devices (such as e-scooters) increases, greater pressure is being placed on shared paths which in turn have led to increased conflict between cyclists/e-scooters and pedestrians. Where separated facilities cannot be provided and an increasing number of cyclists and pedestrians are expected to use the same space there is growing need for management to mitigate potential conflict. Of particular concern to both path users and path managers (asset managers) is the speed of cyclists and Personal Mobility Devices (including e-scooters).
This presentation will draw on several recent applications in Queensland, showing the latest innovations in pavement markings and demonstrate how pavement marking can be used effectively to complement traditional signage. This presentation will use real world examples and present ‘before and after’ behavioural response analysis. Case studies will include (among others): Kurilpa Bridge (Brisbane), Ted Smout Bridge (Redcliffe), Goodwill Bridge (Brisbane) and the Bicentennial Bikeway (Brisbane).
This presentation provides an overview of the recent practice providing operational guidance to designers and asset managers on speed/conflict management techniques for paths shared by pedestrians and cyclists/e-scooters.
